Since the intracellular ATP concentration is three orders of magnitude higher

With a benzoyl or 4-chlorobenzoyl group afforded compounds 29�C33 and 34�C38, respectively, with a larger substituted piperazinyl group than that of 9�C13. Thirdly, replacement of the 4-acetyl group of 9�C13 with a methylsulfonyl or 4-methylphenylsulfonyl group led to compounds 39�C43 and 44�C48, respectively. Lastly, different from above rigid substituted piperazinyl group, a flexible 4- piperazin- 1-yl group was introduced to the 2-position of the quinoxaline scaffold to afford compounds 49�C53. This work led to the identification of a series of piperazinylquinoxaline derivatives, whose synthesis, in vitro evaluation, apoptosis inductive effort, and docking analysis are described herein. As shown in Figure 3, piperidinylquinoxalines 4�C8 were obtained by a microwave-assisted reaction of N-carbamoylpiperazine 54 with 2-chloro-3-arylsulfonylquinoxalines 55�C59. 2- Chloro-3-arylsulfonylquinoxalines 55�C59 were synthesized using the same materials and procedures as reported. As shown in Figure 4, for the synthesis of MCE Chemical MDL28574 piperazinylquinoxalines 9�C53, similar materials and procedures were applied as synthesis of compounds 4�C8 except for the use of compounds 60�C 67 and 70 instead of N-carbamoylpiperazine. Intermediates 63�C 67 were prepared using reported procedure. N-3- piperazine was prepared by a reaction of piperazine with 4- morpholine, which was obtained by a reaction of morpholine with 1-bromo-3-chloropropane. Fifty new derivatives including forty-five piperazinylquinoxalines were synthesized. Their purities were above 95 indicated by HPLC. Biological KU-57788 Evaluation and Structure-Activity Relationships Antiproliferative activity against human cancer cell lines. All synthesized target compounds were firstly tested for their antiproliferative activity against five human cancer cell lines, PC3, A549, HCT116, HL60, and KB, using MTT assay. Compounds WR1 and LY294002 were used as positive controls. As shown in Table 1, 2, 3, both pieridinylquinoxalines 4�C8 and piperazinylquinoxalines 9�C53 exhibited significantly improved antiproliferative activity against most tested cell lines than that of WR1 and LY294002, for example, compounds 4�C8 showed IC50 ranging from 1.17 to 4.36 mM against PC3 cell, compounds 14�C18 showed IC50 ranging from 0.84 to 3.09 mM agai