Rization of KCBP led us to investigate the oligomeric state of

Rization of KCBP led us to investigate the oligomeric state of its regulator KIC. When we analyzed the gelfiltration profile of KIC, we found that the calculated molecular weight for KIC, 35 kDa, was double of its predicted value (17 kDa) (Fig. 4, Table 2). The molecular weight of KIC estimatedDeletion of the Negative Coil Abolishes Dimerization via Regulatory HelixThe interface supporting the observed dimerization of KCBP via the regulatory helix does not seem extensive enough toDimerization of KCBP at C-TerminusFigure 4. Gel-filtration profiles of the isolated KCBP constructs on Superdex200Profiles corresponding to the different KCBP samples are color coded and indicated. Profiles of the protein standards are shown as dashed lines in black. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066669.gby this method was affected neither by presence/absence of Ca2+ nor by deletion of the first 35 N-terminal residues (Table 2). Our findings indicate that KIC also forms 370-86-5 site dimers in solution and that dimerization of KIC is not Ca2+-dependent and does not require the N-terminal peptide. Extensive crystallizations of KIC dimers alone were not successful. In the absence of structural data on KIC by itself, we cannot conclude whether the KIC dimer is compatible with the dimer of KCBP formed by the regulatory helices.Deletion of Regulatory Helix does not Block the Microtubule Bundling by KCBPTo determine the effects of the dimerization via the regulatory helix on microtubule bundling properties of 18204824 KCBP, we performed microtubule bundling assays in the presence of either KCBP (884?1253) or truncated KCBP (884?225). Microtubule bundling was observed using differential interference contrast microscopy (DIC) (Fig. 5). Both KCBP (884?253) and KCBP (884?225) promoted formation of microtubule bundles at concentrations as low as 1 mM and at molar ratios of kinesin to tubulin as low as 1:10. Addition of Ca2+-KIC reversed the action of KCBP (884?253), but not of KCBP (884?225) which lacks the calmodulin/KICbinding domain. Our results showed that the truncated construct of KCBP was sufficient to promote formation of the microtubule bundles. Thus, the regulatory domain and its self-associative properties are not required for the microtubule bundling by KCBP.KCBP-KIC Complex does not Form on Gel-filtration ColumnIn contrast to the stable dimers of individual KCBP and KIC, their heterodimer was not stable in solution enough to stay together during the gel-filtration. In the presence of Ca2+, the KCBP-KIC complex, pre-formed and isolated using binding of the His-tagged KIC on Ni-NTA agarose, dissociated on Superdex-200 into the individual homodimers.Effect of Regulatory Domain on Motility of KCBPTable 2. Molecular weight of different KCBP and KIC constructs determined by gel-filtration on MedChemExpress PS-1145 Superdex 200. To determine whether dimerization via the regulatory helix changes motility of KCBP, we performed motility assays using different constructs of KCBP. We used a construct of KCBP (a.a. 876?261) containing the C-terminal regulatory domain but without the predicted dimerization domain at the N-terminus. We also prepared a construct of KCBP (a.a. 820?225) with the predicted dimerization motif at the N-terminus but without the Cterminal regulatory helix. KCBP (a.a. 820?225) eluted on gelfiltration as a dimer and its MW was measured as 7261 kDa (Table 2). The motility of KCBP (a.a. 876?261) without the dimerization domain at the N-terminus could best be described as a back-andforth movement (Movi.Rization of KCBP led us to investigate the oligomeric state of its regulator KIC. When we analyzed the gelfiltration profile of KIC, we found that the calculated molecular weight for KIC, 35 kDa, was double of its predicted value (17 kDa) (Fig. 4, Table 2). The molecular weight of KIC estimatedDeletion of the Negative Coil Abolishes Dimerization via Regulatory HelixThe interface supporting the observed dimerization of KCBP via the regulatory helix does not seem extensive enough toDimerization of KCBP at C-TerminusFigure 4. Gel-filtration profiles of the isolated KCBP constructs on Superdex200Profiles corresponding to the different KCBP samples are color coded and indicated. Profiles of the protein standards are shown as dashed lines in black. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066669.gby this method was affected neither by presence/absence of Ca2+ nor by deletion of the first 35 N-terminal residues (Table 2). Our findings indicate that KIC also forms dimers in solution and that dimerization of KIC is not Ca2+-dependent and does not require the N-terminal peptide. Extensive crystallizations of KIC dimers alone were not successful. In the absence of structural data on KIC by itself, we cannot conclude whether the KIC dimer is compatible with the dimer of KCBP formed by the regulatory helices.Deletion of Regulatory Helix does not Block the Microtubule Bundling by KCBPTo determine the effects of the dimerization via the regulatory helix on microtubule bundling properties of 18204824 KCBP, we performed microtubule bundling assays in the presence of either KCBP (884?1253) or truncated KCBP (884?225). Microtubule bundling was observed using differential interference contrast microscopy (DIC) (Fig. 5). Both KCBP (884?253) and KCBP (884?225) promoted formation of microtubule bundles at concentrations as low as 1 mM and at molar ratios of kinesin to tubulin as low as 1:10. Addition of Ca2+-KIC reversed the action of KCBP (884?253), but not of KCBP (884?225) which lacks the calmodulin/KICbinding domain. Our results showed that the truncated construct of KCBP was sufficient to promote formation of the microtubule bundles. Thus, the regulatory domain and its self-associative properties are not required for the microtubule bundling by KCBP.KCBP-KIC Complex does not Form on Gel-filtration ColumnIn contrast to the stable dimers of individual KCBP and KIC, their heterodimer was not stable in solution enough to stay together during the gel-filtration. In the presence of Ca2+, the KCBP-KIC complex, pre-formed and isolated using binding of the His-tagged KIC on Ni-NTA agarose, dissociated on Superdex-200 into the individual homodimers.Effect of Regulatory Domain on Motility of KCBPTable 2. Molecular weight of different KCBP and KIC constructs determined by gel-filtration on Superdex 200. To determine whether dimerization via the regulatory helix changes motility of KCBP, we performed motility assays using different constructs of KCBP. We used a construct of KCBP (a.a. 876?261) containing the C-terminal regulatory domain but without the predicted dimerization domain at the N-terminus. We also prepared a construct of KCBP (a.a. 820?225) with the predicted dimerization motif at the N-terminus but without the Cterminal regulatory helix. KCBP (a.a. 820?225) eluted on gelfiltration as a dimer and its MW was measured as 7261 kDa (Table 2). The motility of KCBP (a.a. 876?261) without the dimerization domain at the N-terminus could best be described as a back-andforth movement (Movi.