Tase, as previously described [37]. LC-MS and LC-MS/MS analysis. The digested

Tase, as previously described [37]. LC-MS and LC-MS/MS analysis. The digested RNA was analyzed on an Agilent 1260 series equipped with a diode array detector (DAD) and Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer Agilent 6460. A Synergy Fusion RP column (4 particle size, 80 ?pore size, 250 mm length, 2 mm inner diameter) from Phenomenex (Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used at 35 . The solvents consisted of 5 mM ammonium acetate buffer adjusted to pH 5.3 using 1454585-06-8 acetic acid (solvent A) and pure KDM5A-IN-1 web acetonitrile (solvent B). The elution started with 100 solvent A for 2 minutes followed by a linear gradient to 20 solvent B at 10 min. For complete coumarin-conjugate elution solvent B was increased to 50 at 15 minutes. Initial conditions were regenerated by rinsing with 100 solvent A for 8 minutes. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min. The effluent from the column was first measured photometrical at 254 nm and 320 nm by the DAD, followed by the mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source (Agilent Jet Stream). ESI parameters were as follows: gas temperature 300 , gas flow 5 L/min, nebulizer pressure 35 psi, sheath gas temperature 350 , sheath gas flow 12 L/min and capillary voltage 3500 V. The MS was setup in the MS2scan mode to scan a mass range of 50 to 1000 Dalton in positive ion mode for coumarin-conjugate identification. 10 of conjugated tRNA E. coli were injected and the masses coinciding with UV-signals at 320 nm were used for detailed analysis in a second sample injection in the product ion scan mode. Therefore quadrupole 1 was adjusted to filter the detected masses, followed by fragmentation at 15 eV collision energy in the collision cell and final mass fragment analysis in quadrupole 2. One of the resulting mass spectra is shown in Figure 2C. The resulting mass-transitions for BMB can be found in Table S1 in File S1 and for the other coumarinconjugates in Table S2-S6 in File S1.steps, to account for (i) the injected amount of sample (nA ; normalization to adenosine peak as internal standard); (ii) differential detection efficiency by MS (rf ; response factor); and (iii) the relative abundance of nucleosides in the starting material RNA preparation (cra ; correction for relative abundance). The measured nucleoside and conjugate peaks of LCMS/MS analysis were integrated and the resulting areas constitute the raw data. This raw data was then processed considering the above normalization parameters: (i) nA: for intersample comparability, the raw data was normalized to the MS peak area of adenosine as the internal standard (ii). To compare the extent and ratio of the reactions, correction factors rf based on UV absorption at 320 nm were established. The areas of all conjugate peaks were integrated in both chromatograms (320 nm and MS) and their ratio corresponds the rf values in Table S1-S6 in File S1. Table S7 in File S1 gives an overview over correction thus determined. The sequential application of nA and rf factors to raw data leads to an unbiased dataset to compare the reactivity of the coumarins (Figure 3) (iii). The abundance of each nucleoside in the tRNA E. coli samples was calculated (see Table S8 in File 23977191 S1) and the resulting cra values applied to relate the reactivity dataset to the amount of target nucleosides. With this an overview on the nucleoside selectivity was achieved (Figure 4).Results and DiscussionReaction products of 4-bromomethyl-7methoxycoumarin (BMB) with tRNATo reproduce the reported selectivity of BMB, we dec.Tase, as previously described [37]. LC-MS and LC-MS/MS analysis. The digested RNA was analyzed on an Agilent 1260 series equipped with a diode array detector (DAD) and Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer Agilent 6460. A Synergy Fusion RP column (4 particle size, 80 ?pore size, 250 mm length, 2 mm inner diameter) from Phenomenex (Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used at 35 . The solvents consisted of 5 mM ammonium acetate buffer adjusted to pH 5.3 using acetic acid (solvent A) and pure acetonitrile (solvent B). The elution started with 100 solvent A for 2 minutes followed by a linear gradient to 20 solvent B at 10 min. For complete coumarin-conjugate elution solvent B was increased to 50 at 15 minutes. Initial conditions were regenerated by rinsing with 100 solvent A for 8 minutes. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min. The effluent from the column was first measured photometrical at 254 nm and 320 nm by the DAD, followed by the mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ion source (Agilent Jet Stream). ESI parameters were as follows: gas temperature 300 , gas flow 5 L/min, nebulizer pressure 35 psi, sheath gas temperature 350 , sheath gas flow 12 L/min and capillary voltage 3500 V. The MS was setup in the MS2scan mode to scan a mass range of 50 to 1000 Dalton in positive ion mode for coumarin-conjugate identification. 10 of conjugated tRNA E. coli were injected and the masses coinciding with UV-signals at 320 nm were used for detailed analysis in a second sample injection in the product ion scan mode. Therefore quadrupole 1 was adjusted to filter the detected masses, followed by fragmentation at 15 eV collision energy in the collision cell and final mass fragment analysis in quadrupole 2. One of the resulting mass spectra is shown in Figure 2C. The resulting mass-transitions for BMB can be found in Table S1 in File S1 and for the other coumarinconjugates in Table S2-S6 in File S1.steps, to account for (i) the injected amount of sample (nA ; normalization to adenosine peak as internal standard); (ii) differential detection efficiency by MS (rf ; response factor); and (iii) the relative abundance of nucleosides in the starting material RNA preparation (cra ; correction for relative abundance). The measured nucleoside and conjugate peaks of LCMS/MS analysis were integrated and the resulting areas constitute the raw data. This raw data was then processed considering the above normalization parameters: (i) nA: for intersample comparability, the raw data was normalized to the MS peak area of adenosine as the internal standard (ii). To compare the extent and ratio of the reactions, correction factors rf based on UV absorption at 320 nm were established. The areas of all conjugate peaks were integrated in both chromatograms (320 nm and MS) and their ratio corresponds the rf values in Table S1-S6 in File S1. Table S7 in File S1 gives an overview over correction thus determined. The sequential application of nA and rf factors to raw data leads to an unbiased dataset to compare the reactivity of the coumarins (Figure 3) (iii). The abundance of each nucleoside in the tRNA E. coli samples was calculated (see Table S8 in File 23977191 S1) and the resulting cra values applied to relate the reactivity dataset to the amount of target nucleosides. With this an overview on the nucleoside selectivity was achieved (Figure 4).Results and DiscussionReaction products of 4-bromomethyl-7methoxycoumarin (BMB) with tRNATo reproduce the reported selectivity of BMB, we dec.