Quality' Table two. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentages): 'Do you think that organic Answers

Quality” Table two. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentages): “Do you think that organic Answers Year Healthier Tastier More Attractive Larger Top quality foods are healthier, tastier, additional desirable, or of higher quality”Definitely yes AnswersDefinitely yes Rather yesRather noRather noRather yesDefinitely noDefinitely noI Idon’t know never know2016 Year 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 201920.Healthier 22.14 20.21 56.86 22.14 56.22 56.86 15.53 56.22 13.78 15.53 13.78 three.53 3.53 three.84 three.84 3.86 3.86 four.01 4.7.72 Tastier ten.11 7.72 33.53 ten.11 37.68 33.53 38.29 37.68 32.75 38.29 32.75 7.72 7.72 8.19 eight.19 12.74 12.74 11.28 11.four.More Desirable 9.94 4.52 26.13 9.94 31.83 26.13 47.33 31.83 37.43 47.33 37.43 12.24 12.24 ten.69 ten.69 9.78 9.78 10.11 ten.27.Higher High-quality 24.06 27.36 49.06 24.06 52.05 49.06 15.37 52.05 14.12 15.37 14.12 2.71 2.71 three.93 3.93 five.51 5.51 5.85 five.Supply:Own calculations. Supply: Own calculations.2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x two Input Table (Rows x Columns): four x five Standardization: Row and column profiles 0,Dimension 2; L-Quisqualic acid Activator Eigenvalue: ,00173 (1,450 of Inertia) 0,10 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,00 -0,02 -0,04 -0,06 -0,08 -0,10 -0,12 -0,five -0,four -0,three -0,two -0,1 0,0 0,1 0,2 I do not know Tastier Undoubtedly yes Healthier Higher Top quality Rather yes Rather not Unquestionably not Extra Attractive 2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x two Input Table (Rows x Columns): four x five Standardization: Row and column profilesDimension 2; Eigenvalue: ,00654 (3,301 of Inertia)0,Healthier Rather yes Undoubtedly not Much more Attractive0,0,00 Tastier -0,05 Larger Quality Unquestionably yes -0,Rather not-0,I do not know-0,20 -0,-0,-0,-0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Dimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,18675 (94,22 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsDimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,11656 (97,54 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsFigure 2. Correspondence map: “Do you believe that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, far more attractive, of higher quality” two. Correspondence map: “Do you believe that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, more appealing, of larger quality” Year 2016 year year 2019 (ideal). Source: Personal calculations. Year 2016 (left), (left),2019 (suitable). Source: Personal calculations.Table 2 and Figure two (right) describe the circumstance in 2019. According to the survey, organic food in 2019 was regarded as healthier, too as of higher excellent than standard meals, when not far more eye-catching; see the table and also the correspondence map (p-value is much less than 0.001, chi-square = 572.13, degrees of freedom = 12). The survey revealed a optimistic shift in organic meals reputation, see Table 3. The proportion of respondents who by no means purchased organic meals plunged to half of its original level. Nonetheless, we recorded a rise inside the number of respondents who didn’t care regardless of whether it was organic or not. Substantial statistical dependence was confirmed (p-value is much less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = 3).Agriculture 2021, 11,The survey revealed a positive shift in organic food recognition, see Table three. The proportion of respondents who by no means bought organic meals plunged to half of its original level. Nonetheless, we recorded an increase in the variety of respondents who did not care irrespective of whether it was organic or not. Important statistical dependence was verified (p-value is 7 of 16 less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = three).Table three. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentage.